I still use reiserfs and am extremely happy with it. Noticeable speed over ext3 for disk intensive stuff (gzip/tar/bzip2 large files, svn etc). I'm thinking about trying ZFS at some point. It is supposed to be super fast. But I've heard that there are problems if, say, you lose power and something isn't written to disk yet. The whole filesystem can be corrupted. Has anyone here used ZFS?<br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Brad Bartram <<a href="mailto:brad.bartram@gmail.com">brad.bartram@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
I just finished reading an article over at Arstech about filesystems (<a href="http://arstechnica.com/articles/paedia/past-present-future-file-systems.ars/" target="_blank">http://arstechnica.com/articles/paedia/past-present-future-file-systems.ars/</a>) and was curious if anyone here is running anything on their linux boxes beside the stock ext3 or ext2. Has anyone played with other filesystems? I used reiser back in the day, probably while ol' Hans still had a relatively happy marriage. Since I run macs, I'm primarily using HFS+ though my linux boxes run standard ext2 and ext3.<br>
<br><br>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
nflug mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:nflug@nflug.org">nflug@nflug.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.nflug.org/mailman/listinfo/nflug" target="_blank">http://www.nflug.org/mailman/listinfo/nflug</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>