<DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV>In response to the following, you are correct about progress/innovation, <U>but my comment</U> was about the average end user, student and home/small business. Do we really need it? It is fine for those that truly have a need of such resources. Now think a minute, regardless of your computing skills or needs do you really think that the average end user which is the gross marketed target really needs all this and more.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Your speaking from where you see it, as your needs as a computer professional might surpass the current available resources available to you. The industry will produce progress/innovation to be marketed, yet does anyone really think it is for the consumers, or is it for corporate industry. People will always want the latest and the greatest as long as they have money to burn, and corporations are ready willing and able to exploit their egos. We all know that the vast computers sold are targeted for end users to email, web browse, gaming, and let us not forget the parts on the web that make the most money! I need not mention.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>So in conclusion, my comment "fast enough & Overkill" are valid points as long as the technology used as of now by end users can keep up with the Internet, but as trends make todays technology out of date the market will always have a guaranty of more revenue through the pocketbooks of the consumers. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Ron Maggio</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">"Fast Enough" will always be relative to current needs. As more, and<BR>higher quality, content feeds come online more bandwidth will be needed.<BR>I can still remember people telling me that 56k was all you would ever<BR>need. Then came streaming video, and to get a good quality feed you<BR>really needed to get broadband. "Fast Enough" assumes that there will<BR>not be any progress/innovation in multimedia formats or content<BR>distribution. <BR><BR>So, for the long term outlook it is hardly overkill. Is it overkill to<BR>have a 200GB hard drive? Maybe it is today, but in 2-3 more years it<BR>won't. We, as a society, are putting more data online everyday, and with<BR>that comes more need for bandwidth and storage.<BR><BR>Also, Verizon is talking about using the same feed to create its own<BR>cable network. This just might break the cable monopolies that currently<BR>exist in!
each
city. After all, your only choices right now are satellite<BR>or cable if you want more content than is on public airwaves. This would<BR>also drive the need for bandwidth.<BR><BR>The downside to this is that they are talking about making access to the<BR>fiber lines closed, unlike the current phone lines. They argue that this<BR>is required because the current cable companies have closed access.<BR>Personally, I would prefer it if BOTH the phone company and cable<BR>company were required to have open access. This would be better for the<BR>consumer in terms of competition and innovation. If the cable/phone<BR>companies have closed access they can then regulate what can and what<BR>cannot be put on the network, thus killing the end-toend concept that<BR>the internet was created on. Innovation would then be regulated by those<BR>companies as well. Anyone remember the time when AT&T regulated what<BR>could and what could not be attached to their phone lines?<BR><BR>Some o!
ther
alternatives to access may become available as well, like<BR>this one:<BR>http://www.cbc.ca/story/science/national/2004/07/16/anik040716.html.<BR>Granted, it's a bit more expensive, but that may change as more<BR>companies put up similar satellites.<BR><BR>The more competition and innovation, the better.<BR><BR>Tim<BR><BR>On Tue, 2004-07-20 at 01:54, Ronald Maggio wrote:<BR>> Over kill, unless your running a business big time and really need the<BR>> bandwidth and the speed it gives you, or are into interactive gaming<BR>> over the Internet in a big way!<BR>> <BR>> I have ADSL through Verizon at $34.95 a month, and its fast enough for<BR>> the average user. ie: Student, Home to mid size Business, and so on. <BR>> <BR>> Ron<BR>> <BR></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV><p>
<hr size=1>Do you Yahoo!?<br>
<a href="http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/yahoo/votelifeengine/">Vote for the stars of Yahoo!'s next ad campaign!</a>